• DOCUMENTED The Department of Defense formally released three Navy videos on 27 April 2020. The release covered FLIR1 (recorded 14 November 2004), GIMBAL and GO FAST (both recorded off the East Coast in early 2015). DoD's stated purpose was "to clear up any misconceptions by the public on whether or not the footage that has been circulating was real." The release authenticated the footage. It made no claim about what is in it.
• DOCUMENTED A Navy "range fouler" report on the 2004 incident exists and has been released under FOIA. The Navy posted 72 heavily redacted range-incursion reports spanning 2004–2021 to its online FOIA reading room in a folder labelled "UAP INFO" (posted 12 January 2023; first reported by Joseph Trevithick, The War Zone, 13 January 2023). The 2004 entry describes the object as "solid white, smooth, with no edges… uniformly colored with no nacelles, pylons, or wings… approximately 46 feet in length," and records that "Pilots reported the incident through Intelligence Personnel. Reporting terminated at 3rd Fleet, there was no process to share the reporting."
• DOCUMENTED Navy spokesman Joseph Gradisher confirmed the videos in September 2019 and adopted the term "unidentified aerial phenomena," describing the incidents as part of "an increased number of training range incursions." Pentagon spokesperson Susan Gough repeated the framing.
• DOCUMENTED Sworn congressional testimony exists. Retired Cmdr David Fravor and former Lt Ryan Graves testified under oath before the House Oversight Committee's National Security subcommittee on 26 July 2023 ("Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Implications on National Security, Public Safety, and Government Transparency"). Written statements are on the committee record.
• UNSUPPORTED The material that is NOT documented: the USS Princeton's raw radar tapes, the aircraft's full ATFLIR metadata and flight telemetry, the F/A-18 radar tapes, and any contemporaneous mishap or intelligence report beyond the range-fouler entry. None has been publicly released. Everything about radar behaviour, altitudes and speeds therefore rests on witness recollection, not on data a reader can inspect.

DoD release statement, 27 April 2020. Navy FOIA reading room, "UAP INFO," Range Fouler Reports (redacted), posted 12 January 2023; Joseph Trevithick, "Tic Tac UAP Incident Included In 72 Newly Released Range Incursion Reports," The War Zone, 13 January 2023. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability hearing record, 26 July 2023.

• TESTIMONY The intercept. Fravor testified that on 14 November 2004, during a Carrier Strike Group 11 workup off southern California, he and his wingman were vectored off a training mission to investigate contacts. He testified he saw a "white Tic Tac object with a longitudinal axis pointing north south," roughly 40 ft long, moving erratically above a disturbance in the water, in conditions of "clear skies, light winds, calm seas, no whitecaps."
• TESTIMONY Four witnesses, about five minutes. Two pilots (Fravor and then-Lt Alex Dietrich, flying the second F/A-18F) and their two weapons systems officers observed the object. Fravor testified that as he descended to engage it, the object mirrored his arc and then accelerated out of sight.
• TESTIMONY The "60 miles in under a minute" claim. Fravor testified the controller aboard USS Princeton told him "that thing is at your CAP point roughly 60 miles away in less than a minute." Note the chain: this is Fravor recounting what a controller told him about a radar picture that has never been released. It is testimony about a radar report, not radar data.
• TESTIMONY The second sortie recorded the video. Fravor's aircraft did not record the encounter. A later sortie — Lt Cmdr Chad Underwood, the weapons systems officer in a different jet — acquired the object and recorded what became FLIR1. Underwood coined "Tic Tac." He has stated publicly he prioritised getting the recording, and that he saw the object only through the sensor, not with his eyes.
• DISPUTED Whether the object "jammed" the radar. Underwood has stated that when he attempted to lock the object his radar returned indications he read as jamming, and that he tracked with the ATFLIR instead. Skeptical analysts note that the same display behaviour is produced by an intermittent or low-quality return, and that no radar tape has been released against which the jamming interpretation could be checked. Both readings remain live.

← swipe table →

David Fravor and Ryan Graves, written statements and oral testimony, House Oversight National Security Subcommittee hearing, 26 July 2023 (transcript HHRG-118-GO06). Underwood interview, New York Magazine / Intelligencer, December 2019. Day and Voorhis accounts are from later interviews and documentary appearances, not from released records.

• TESTIMONY Kevin Day's account. Day, a Senior Chief Operations Specialist and TOPGUN-qualified air intercept controller aboard USS Princeton, states that in the days before 14 November 2004 the ship's AN/SPY-1B Aegis radar repeatedly held groups of contacts appearing at very high altitude and descending rapidly, and that he vectored Fravor's flight onto one of them. The frequently repeated figures — "two weeks" of tracking, "80,000 feet," near-instantaneous descents — originate in Day's later public accounts.
• DISPUTED Was it a radar artifact? Voorhis and Day state the crew suspected a fault, swapped hardware and reloaded software, and the tracks continued — which they present as ruling out a glitch. Skeptics counter that the Princeton had recently completed a combat-system upgrade, that spurious tracks are a known behaviour of a newly-configured Aegis system, and that a crew's own confidence that they eliminated a fault is not the same as a documented fault analysis. No engineering report has been released either way.
• UNSUPPORTED "The data was confiscated." Several Princeton and Nimitz crew have said that unidentified personnel came aboard and removed recording media. No document, chain-of-custody record, or named office has ever been produced, and no official body has confirmed it. It remains an unevidenced claim made by identifiable people.
• DOCUMENTED What we can check. Only the range-fouler report and the FLIR1 video. Neither contains radar tracks, altitudes or speeds.

• DOCUMENTED The artefact itself. About 76 seconds of ATFLIR imagery from an F/A-18F, in infrared with the sensor cycling zoom and polarity, ending with the object moving rapidly out of frame to the left. Officially released by DoD 27 April 2020; in circulation since 2007 and republished by The New York Times on 16 December 2017.
• TESTIMONY The proponent reading. Underwood and Fravor state the object had no wings, no exhaust plume and no visible control surfaces, and that the departure at the end shows genuine acceleration. Fravor testified the technology "was far superior than anything that we had."
• DISPUTED The skeptical reading. Mick West argues the dramatic exit is an artefact: it is consistent with the tracking gate losing lock and the sensor slewing, rather than with the object accelerating away — the same mechanism West argues elsewhere. (An earlier framing of this argument in terms of a 1×–2× zoom change is not how West states it.). He proposes a distant aircraft flying away from the camera. Proponents reply that a distant jet does not account for the pilots' separate visual encounter earlier that day, and that West's identification is a hypothesis with no candidate aircraft named. Neither position has been settled with data.
• DOCUMENTED AARO has not published a resolution for FLIR1. As of August 2026 the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office has issued case-resolution reports for eight cases — Southeast Asia "Triangles," Western United States, Atmospheric Wakes, Eglin, Go Fast, a Puerto Rico case, Mt Etna and Al Taqaddum. Caution: it has not been established publicly that AARO’s “Puerto Rico” case is the 2013 Aguadilla event. This site treats Aguadilla as unresolved and contested — see the Hoaxes and Videos sections — and does not assume the two are the same case. The Nimitz/FLIR1 case is not among them.

FLIR1 video, NAVAIR FOIA reading room; DoD Public Affairs release, 27 April 2020. Mick West, "2004 USS Nimitz Tic Tac UFO FLIR footage (FLIR1)," Metabunk thread 9190, and associated video analyses; see also "Possible explanation for radar jamming in the Nimitz encounter," Metabunk thread 11862. AARO case resolution reports index, aaro.mil.

• DISPUTED A 13-page document titled "Tic Tac UFO Executive Report" circulated from 2018, published via KLAS/Mystery Wire (George Knapp) and mirrored widely. It contains a detailed narrative of the encounter, radar behaviour and follow-on analysis, and is routinely cited online as if it were an official Pentagon report.
• UNSUPPORTED Its provenance has never been confirmed. No issuing office, author, classification marking chain or DoD acknowledgement has been established. The Pentagon has not authenticated it. It may be a genuine contractor or working-group product, or a compilation by private researchers; there is currently no way for a reader to tell.
• DOCUMENTED What to cite instead: the FOIA-released range-fouler report (Navy FOIA reading room, January 2023) is an authenticated government record covering the same incident, and it is far thinner than the leaked document.

"Tic Tac UFO Executive Report," undated, unattributed, published via Mystery Wire/KLAS-TV, 2018. Never authenticated by DoD. Compare the authenticated record: Navy FOIA range fouler reports, January 2023.

• TESTIMONY Graves's core claim. Ryan Graves, an F/A-18F pilot with VFA-11 flying out of NAS Oceana, testified: "After upgrades were made to our jet's radar systems, we began detecting unknown objects operating in our airspace." The Super Hornet fleet was transitioning to the AN/APG-79 AESA radar in this period. Graves's framing is that the objects were probably always there and the new radar made them visible.
• TESTIMONY "Every day for at least a couple years." Graves said this on CBS 60 Minutes (16 May 2021), interviewed by Bill Whitaker, describing sightings during training off the Atlantic coast. Lt Danny Accoin appeared in the same segment describing his own encounters.
• TESTIMONY The near-miss. Graves testified that during a training mission in Warning Area W-72, about 10 miles off Virginia Beach, "two F-18 Super Hornets were split by a UAP" that "came within 50 feet of the lead aircraft." He testified the squadron submitted a safety report but "there was no (Graves relays this from a squadron mate — it is not his own sighting.) official acknowledgement of the incident and no further mechanism to report the sightings."
• TESTIMONY The described object. Graves testified that aircrew observed "a dark gray or black cube inside of a clear sphere," and that this description recurred over roughly eight years. (Graves relays this from a squadron mate — it is not his own sighting.)
• UNSUPPORTED The safety report itself has not surfaced. No hazard report (HAZREP), aviation safety report or squadron record documenting the near-miss has been publicly released or FOIA-produced. The fact of Graves's sworn statement is verifiable; the document he refers to is not currently available to check.
• DOCUMENTED The East Coast incidents entered the official record. The 2023 FOIA-released range-fouler set includes 2015 East Coast reports alongside the 2004 Nimitz entry, and the Navy's 2019 statements referred explicitly to increased range incursions in this period.

Ryan Graves, written and oral testimony, House Oversight National Security Subcommittee, 26 July 2023. CBS 60 Minutes, "UFOs regularly spotted in restricted US airspace," 16 May 2021. Helene Cooper, Ralph Blumenthal and Leslie Kean, "'Wow, What Is That?' Navy Pilots Report Unexplained Flying Objects," The New York Times, 26 May 2019.

• DOCUMENTED The video. ATFLIR footage recorded off the US East Coast on or about 21 January 2015 by a Roosevelt-based F/A-18F; released by DoD 27 April 2020. The audio includes aircrew reacting to a formation of contacts on the radar display ("there's a whole fleet of them").
• TESTIMONY The aircrew reading. Graves and others state the object was one of a formation, that it rotated about its axis, and that it moved against a strong wind with no visible means of propulsion.
• DISPUTED The glare hypothesis. Mick West argues the "object" is infrared glare around a distant heat source — plausibly a jet 20–30+ nautical miles away — and that the apparent rotation is the ATFLIR's own gimbal de-rotation as the pod tracks through a mechanical singularity. He points to the object not rotating when the aircraft banks (which rotates the horizon), to camera "bumps" immediately preceding each rotation step, and to the video's official filename.
• DISPUTED The counter-case. Critics of the glare model argue the ATFLIR's off-axis three-mirror optical design would not produce the observed glare geometry, that the observed rotation rate does not match a simple de-rotation profile, and that the model does not explain the separate radar formation the aircrew describe. The argument has run for years on both sides without a decisive test, largely because the pod's raw data and the aircraft's telemetry have never been released.
• DOCUMENTED No official resolution exists. AARO has published no case-resolution report for GIMBAL as of August 2026. Claims circulating online that AARO has issued a 2026 analysis declaring GIMBAL inconsistent with all prosaic explanations could not be verified against any AARO publication and should be treated as unsourced.

GIMBAL video, NAVAIR FOIA reading room; DoD Public Affairs release, 27 April 2020. Mick West, "A Gimbal Glare Explainer," Metabunk thread 12230, and related threads. AARO case resolution reports index, aaro.mil (no GIMBAL entry).

• DOCUMENTED AARO resolved it. "Go Fast Case Resolution Card and Methodology," All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, 6 February 2025. AARO assessed the object was at roughly 13,000 ft — not skimming the ocean — and that its wind-compensated speed was on the order of 5 to 92 mph depending on assumed geometry, against winds of about 69 mph from the west at that altitude. AARO's conclusion: "AARO assesses with high confidence that the object did not move at anomalous speeds," with the apparent speed "attributable to motion parallax."
• DOCUMENTED AARO's own caveats. The office worked from a compressed copy of the video because original metadata was lost, and lacked complete F/A-18F telemetry, requiring assumptions about aircraft heading. It did not identify the object; it concluded only that its motion was consistent with something light drifting on the wind, such as a balloon.
• RESOLVED The independent analysis got there first. Mick West published essentially the same parallax reconstruction in 2018, deriving a slow-moving object at altitude rather than a fast one at sea level. AARO's 2025 report is an official confirmation of an outside result that circulated for seven years while the video was still being presented publicly as evidence of extreme speed.

← swipe table →

• DOCUMENTED ODNI, "Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena," 25 June 2021. Reviewed 144 reports from US government sources dating from 2004; explained exactly one (a deflating balloon). It stated that limited data left most cases unresolved, and that apparent unusual movement "could be the result of sensor errors, spoofing, or observer misperception." It did not endorse an extraterrestrial explanation for any case, including these.
• DOCUMENTED Congressional hearings. House Intelligence subcommittee, 17 May 2022 (Ronald Moultrie and Scott Bray) — the first open congressional UAP hearing in over fifty years. House Oversight National Security subcommittee, 26 July 2023 (Fravor, Graves, Grusch). Both are on the public record; both produced testimony, not adjudication.
• DOCUMENTED AARO's historical review found nothing on recovered craft. "Report on the Historical Record of U.S. Government Involvement with Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena, Volume 1," AARO, March 2024. It addresses alleged hidden programmes rather than these specific encounters, and does not resolve either the Nimitz or the GIMBAL case.

ODNI Preliminary Assessment: UAP, 25 June 2021. AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1, March 2024. House Intelligence Subcommittee on Counterterrorism, Counterintelligence and Counterproliferation hearing, 17 May 2022. House Oversight National Security Subcommittee hearing, 26 July 2023.

• DOCUMENTED Ryan Graves founded and directs Americans for Safe Aerospace, a 501(c)(3) that campaigns for aircrew UAP reporting and states it has thousands of members; his written testimony cites the organisation's own reporting figures. He previously worked on military autonomy at BAE Systems FAST Labs. His advocacy position — that UAP are a flight-safety and airspace-integrity problem — is the position his organisation exists to press.
• DOCUMENTED David Fravor has become a prominent paid public speaker and podcast guest on the subject since 2017 and appears in commercial documentary productions. He has not, as far as can be verified, held a stake in a UAP-related company.
• DOCUMENTED Alex Dietrich has consistently declined to characterise what she saw beyond "unidentified," has not built a public career on the encounter, and has publicly discouraged extraterrestrial readings of her account. That restraint is itself evidence about how the witnesses differ.
• DOCUMENTED Kevin Day and other Princeton crew appear in commercial documentaries and paid conference appearances on the encounter. This does not make their accounts false; it does mean their accounts have been told many times to audiences that reward vividness.
• DOCUMENTED Mick West is an author (Escaping the Rabbit Hole, 2018) and runs Metabunk and a YouTube channel supported by his debunking output. His analyses have been vindicated at least once by AARO (GO FAST) and remain contested elsewhere (GIMBAL). Apply the same scrutiny: a hypothesis offered by a skeptic is still a hypothesis until it is tested.
• DOCUMENTED The government has institutional incentives too. A resolution that closes a case is cheaper than one that does not, and AARO has been publicly criticised by members of Congress from both parties over its transparency. Its published resolutions should be read on their methodology, not on its authority.

• Statement by the Department of Defense on the Release of Historical Navy Videos US Department of Defense, 27 April 2020 · official release of FLIR/GIMBAL/GO FAST
• NAVAIR FOIA Reading Room — Documents (UAP video files) Naval Air Systems Command · where the three videos are hosted
• Range Fouler Reports, Redacted (January 2023) Navy FOIA reading room, "UAP INFO" · 72 range-incursion reports, 2004–2021
• Joseph Trevithick, "Tic Tac UAP Incident Included In Newly Released Range Incursion Reports" The War Zone, 13 January 2023 · first reporting on the FOIA release
• "US Navy confirms previously released UFO videos show 'unidentified aerial phenomena'" CNN, 18 September 2019 · Gradisher's on-record confirmation
• Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Implications on National Security, Public Safety, and Government Transparency (Serial No. 118-53) House Oversight, 26 July 2023 · printed hearing record on GovInfo
• Hearing transcript HHRG-118-GO06, 26 July 2023 Congress.gov · verbatim transcript of the Fravor/Graves/Grusch hearing
• Written statement of Cmdr David Fravor (Ret.) House Oversight, 26 July 2023 · his sworn Nimitz account
• Written statement of Ryan Graves, Americans for Safe Aerospace House Oversight, 26 July 2023 · Roosevelt sightings and W-72 near-miss
• Written statement of David Grusch House Oversight, 26 July 2023 · third witness at the same hearing
• Unidentified Aerial Phenomena hearing transcript, 17 May 2022 House Intelligence subcommittee · Moultrie and Bray testimony
• Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena ODNI, 25 June 2021 · 144 reports reviewed, one explained
• Go Fast Case Resolution Card and Methodology AARO, 6 February 2025 · the parallax resolution of GO FAST
• AARO UAP Case Resolution Reports (index) All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office · every case AARO has closed
• Report on the Historical Record of U.S. Government Involvement with UAP, Volume 1 AARO, March 2024 · found no evidence of recovered craft
• "2004 USS Nimitz Tic Tac UFO FLIR footage (FLIR1)" Mick West, Metabunk thread 9190 · the skeptical FLIR1 analysis
• "Possible explanation for radar jamming in the Nimitz encounter" Metabunk thread 11862 · the counter-reading of Underwood's jamming
• "A Gimbal Glare Explainer" Mick West, Metabunk thread 12230 · the rotating-glare hypothesis
• "GO FAST Footage from Tom DeLonge's To The Stars Academy. Bird? Balloon?" Metabunk thread 9569, 2018 · the parallax result AARO later confirmed
• "Navy Pilot Who Filmed a UFO Speaks: 'It Wasn't Behaving by the Laws of Physics'" New York Magazine / Intelligencer, December 2019 · Chad Underwood's first interview
• "2 Navy Airmen and an Object That 'Accelerated Like Nothing I've Ever Seen'" The New York Times, 16 December 2017 · the story that published FLIR1 (paywalled)
• "'Wow, What Is That?' Navy Pilots Report Unexplained Flying Objects" The New York Times, 26 May 2019 · the East Coast sightings (paywalled)
• "UFOs regularly spotted in restricted U.S. airspace" CBS 60 Minutes, 16 May 2021 · Graves, Accoin and Dietrich on camera
• "I-Team Exclusive: Confidential report analyzes Tic Tac UFO incidents" George Knapp, Mystery Wire / KLAS-TV, 2018 · publisher of the unauthenticated report
• Americans for Safe Aerospace 501(c)(3) founded by Ryan Graves · the advocacy organisation named above
• Escaping the Rabbit Hole (Mick West, 2018) Author's own site · the book referenced in the incentives card
• USS Princeton AN/SPY-1B radar tapes, ATFLIR raw metadata and F/A-18F telemetry for all three videos Never publicly released — no stable public URL found
• Squadron hazard/safety report on the W-72 near-miss (HAZREP) Not released or FOIA-produced — no stable public URL found
• Kevin Day and Gary Voorhis accounts (documentary and interview appearances) Not from released records — no stable public URL found
• Susan Gough / Pentagon spokesperson statements on range incursions Given to reporters, not published as a document — no stable public URL found

Links verified August 2026. Unlinked items in this section are ones for which no stable public URL could be confirmed. Some .mil and news links return 403 to automated requests but resolve normally in a browser.

Images are public domain or freely licensed; each carries its credit and licence, and links to its source record. Served from this site rather than hotlinked.